Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Devil is in the Details

In America, the concept of Representative Democracy theoretically provides each citizen a proportionate voice in government through the election process.  Those elected officials serve their constituents, and the nation in general, by creating the laws under which we all manage to co-exist.  The faithful enforcement of those laws is delegated to the Executive branch of government and executed through a wide array of bureaus, departments and agencies.  As the number of laws has increased over time, so too has the number and size of the enforcement entities.  The resulting bureaucracy is managed through a pyramidal system that ultimately becomes difficult to manage in the chaos of election vagaries and changing leadership priorities.  In this environment, "top down management" only works to a limited degree.  Changes in policy at the bureau management level happen slowly in most cases, if at all.  By the same token "undoing" bureaucratic action is easier said than done.  Consequently, mid-level managers who have inherent protections—including job security that elected officials lack—are effectively empowered far beyond normal expectations.  They make decisions daily that affect literally millions of people.  For the most part, I believe these bureaucrats have the best interests of the nation at heart and do their best to serve.  But, they are human.  Some will inevitably be influenced by a special interest that strikes a chord with them.  Since the enforcement of law can require more detail than legislation typically provides, rule-making at agencies becomes a critical element of the process.  These rules can either support the letter and intent of legislation or they may reflect the interests or preferences, or even the training, of enforcement agency personnel.  As always, the devil is in the details and they can be more subtle than politically appointed managers realize.  This is especially true when there is a significant span of time between enactment of law and bureaucratic rule-changes.  When agency rules fail to enforce a law in the manner intended and anticipated by Congress, the system suffers a break-down in confidence, effectiveness and credibility.  At that point, law becomes a hammer rather than a harbor.

Although the "rules" of enforcement for the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (CCPIA) are guided by the State Department's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, the action agency is actually Homeland Security's U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  Customs agents at every U.S. port of entry are trained, often by Archaeologists, to identify, detain and seize cultural property that is restricted from importation in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States and a foreign nation.  The MOU is consummated and its scope determined, according to strict parameters of law, by the U.S. State Department (DOS) with guidance provided to CBP for implementation.  Therein lies the devil—in the details of implementation.  What may start out as a rational effort to protect cultural heritage can become a repressive and extralegal process that infringes on the rights of ordinary law abiding citizens.

Recent press coverage of an event held by CBP's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), at the Boston Public Library, highlights a few objects being repatriated to Italy that were allegedly determined by ICE to be illicit.  In addition the occasion was apparently convenient for transferring to Italy "nearly 200" ancient Roman coins that ICE had originally detained in Cincinnati  more than three years ago.  Although some of the objects at this public repatriation were significant and worthy of press coverage, the coins were very low grade and exceedingly common late Roman bronzes of a general type and character found in Middle Eastern "desert" climates.  Virtually any serious collector of these coins would immediately recognize the powdery yellow and reddish patina that distinguishes them.  In all but the very rarest of cases these types of coins are not the sort of significant cultural property that CCPIA protects.  One can't help but wonder why they were detained, much less seized, and why they were being repatriated to Italy?

There are several paths that might lead CBP to seize ancient coins.  If the appraised value of imported coins is greater than $5,000, and there is evidence that the coins were stolen, the coins may be seized by CBP under the authority of the National Stolen Property Act (NSPA).  Most source countries for ancient coins have National Patrimony laws that vest ownership of all artifacts, including coins from antiquity, with the State.  Therefore, any object exported from these lands without a State permit is by default "stolen" from the State.  The recipient of such property in the U.S. may in some cases be guilty of a criminal law violation with serious consequences.  A second path to seizure would be illegal importation of a coin or coins that have been restricted through a Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. and a country from which the coins had been exported.  Import restrictions are authorized under specific criteria outlined in CCPIA and enforced by CBP on a case by case basis as determined by the State Department in a "designated list" of items.  These coins would by law need to have first been found in, and subject to export control of, the MOU partner nation.  Bureaucratic rule-making has expanded that and other criteria in alarming ways.  A third path that ancient coins and other private property may be seized by ICE is through the process of "Civil Forfeiture" which allows law enforcement agencies to seize objects that are suspected of being involved in criminal activity—whether or not the owner was actually charged or convicted.  This increasingly controversial action is not particular to coins nor the importation process.   A fourth way is if imported coins are entered into the U.S. by means of a false statement.

The coins seized in Cincinnati were evaluated by a CBP contract "expert" who identified them as Roman Imperial bronze coins and apparently determined their value to be less that $5,000, which ruled out the NSPA.  The stated invoice price was actually $1,000, which seems reasonable considering the nature of the coins shown in press releases. Under no circumstances would they meet the NSPA threshold.  At some point, CBP must also have realized that the coins were exported from United Arab Emirates, and the U.S. does not have an MOU with UAE under the authority of CCPIA.   Since there was no evidence of associated criminal activity, Civil Forfeiture was apparently ruled out.  It would have been appropriate at that point for CBP to release the shipment with an apology and move on.  However, three years ago there was a clamor in the Archaeological community and surrogate Media for widespread prohibitions on importation of virtually all cultural property.  Returning these coins to their rightful owner might have been politically embarrassing.  That left CBP with only one option—the false statement route.  These coins were obviously found in the Middle East—not in Italy—based on photos released by CBP.  Mint names on some of the coins, iconographic details on others and "desert patina" on virtually all leave no doubt as to their source.    When CBP interviewed the importer they reportedly were told that the coins had a Middle East origin.  The only viable explanation for seizure by means of "false statement" seems to be that ICE agents erroneously assumed Italy was the point of origin for all Roman Coins.  Any other explanation would suggest intentional extralegal enforcement.  Once the coins were seized, the importer had the right under law to appeal and contest the seizure.  However, the cost of doing so and effecting a reversal of this action would far outstrip the value of the coins themselves.  Keep in mind that the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild has been in court for eight years, with significant costs to both the Guild and the U.S. Government, fighting the extralegal seizure of $275 worth of low grade ancient coins.   It is understandable that the importer simply gave up the coins.  Whether intentional or not, this amounts to intimidation by a government agency charged with serving the public.  The private property of a citizen in cases like this is seized without justification—and that is the basis of the ACCG court case which is in effect a class action suit on behalf of all collectors.  Even if the documentation in Cincinnati were inaccurate, and it does not seem to be, the typical penalty in minor cases like this would be a reasonable fine, not seizure.  Ironically, even if the coins had all been struck at the mint in Rome they were still not covered by the existing MOU with Italy because that MOU does not include Roman Imperial Coins, only early Italian and Republican coins and coinage of Greek colonies in southern Italy.

Adding insult to injury, CBP has now repatriated the coins to Italy—where they had probably never seen the light of day—and then self-applauded their "protection of cultural antiquities".  There was no reason to detain or seize the above coins and no reason to repatriate them to Italy or anywhere else for that matter.  One could easily imagine that a Customs Agent in Cincinnati might not be familiar with ancient Roman coins and might need to hold a shipment for a few days pending examination by a more knowledgeable party.  One could even imagine that a person contracted by CBP as an "expert" on ancient coins might err or be misunderstood, but the above case is not a unique example of collateral damage. Extralegal and unduly aggressive seizures by CBP and ICE are of increasing concern to the many thousands of Americans who buy coins legally from foreign vendors.  That concern will not be alleviated until the letter and intent of existing law is restored.



 

Saturday, April 22, 2017

The Law and Ultra Vires

Cultural Heritage Lawyer Rick St. Hilaire, an apologist for cultural property nationalists and a critic of private ownership and trade in cultural property, has posted on his blog a quite lucid history of the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG) experiences in District and Appellate Court over the past eight years. The post is surprisingly light on the editorializing or histrionics one might expect.  It simply relates the facts and the positions of the two adversaries with reasonable clarity—as well as the judgement rendered.  I highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in cultural property issues.

That legal journey has in many ways reflected poorly on the Federal Bureaucracy and the Justice system in America.  Of course that is not the conclusion of Mr. St. Hilaire, it is my own view and inescapably stems from my own background and experiences.  The "law" in America that implements the cultural property protection resolutions of UNESCO, promulgated in 1970, is the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (CCPIA).  It is often referred to simply as CPIA.  That law was thoroughly debated in Congress and did not reach a point of consensus and approval until 1983.  In the process, the purpose of the Act and provisions for its implementation were very carefully codified.  Specific protections for private ownership and trade in cultural property were intentionally incorporated in terms that were (and still are) unambiguous.  As a result, many collectors and dealers in minor antiquities applauded the implementation of this Act.  Indeed, for some who were infatuated with ancient history and were themselves protecting that flame, that law was a positive force.  Personally, I still defend CCPIA and have done so publicly and in person at nine formal hearings of the State Department's Cultural Property Advisory Committee.  As enacted, I believe it was and still is a good law.  Unfortunately, the law is no longer being administered as it was intended and bureaucratic rule-making has supplanted the will of Congress.  

For the first two decades after enactment, CCPIA worked as intended and focused on serious threats to Cultural Heritage.  Midway in the first decade of this century there were warning signs that change was afoot.  The Archaeological community theme that "Collecting equals Looting",  championed by Lord Colin Renfrew, had by then become a cult-like mantra.  A radical element dominated much of academia and Archaeological Institute of America leadership—and still does.  What had for centuries been a productive alliance between professionals and amateurs evolved into a bitter struggle as Archaeologists became infatuated with control and dominance over what they envisioned as "their" turf.   They were very well positioned to infiltrate and influence government agencies based on their credentials, social standing and natural affinity for institutional networking.  It didn't take long for the protections that Congress wrote into CCPIA to vanish.  By 2007, with bureaucratic intervention, the emphasis had shifted from protection of significant objects of cultural heritage to control of virtually all objects made in antiquity and well into the 18th century.  The objects are targeted in a laundry list of items defined as "Cultural Property" in the UNESCO Convention, including even postage stamps over 100 years old. They include an unfathomable scope of personal and household items sold, traded, lost or disposed of over several millennia of civilization. Among these are hundreds of millions of ordinary coins that traveled far and wide both in antiquity and in modern times.

In the wake of this dramatic change, private collectors and dealers in ancient coins became alarmed at the potential threat to their venerable 600-year-old hobby.  The nonprofit Ancient Coin Collectors Guild was formed in 2004 to provide representation for tens of thousands of American collectors of ancient coins.  It's membership and support come from many foreign lands as well.  In 2009, the Guild chose to challenge in U.S. Federal Court changes in bureaucratic rule-making that law professors Urice and Adler at the University of Miami have cited in Rutgers Law Review as "lawless" and in an earlier paper as "extralegal".  The biggest deviation from law involves a bureaucratic reinterpretation that placed the "burden of proof" over legal/illegal status on an importer of objects rather than on the government.  Must a collector prove, through an evidentiary process other than the standard required declaration, that an administratively detained or seized coin or group of coins was legally imported, or must the government, in a seizure, prove that they were not legally imported?  What is the standard under law?  That rather simple question has been batted around in courts like a tetherball for the past eight years and is yet to be judged on its actual merits.  That in itself is a sad commentary.

When ACCG imported a small mixed group of ancient coins from Cyprus and China, it was with the expectation that they would be detained and ultimately seized.  They were indeed detained, and Customs was advised of the intentions of ACCG to challenge a seizure.  Ignoring the standard deadline, Customs refused to issue the seizure notice that would allow ACCG to contest.  After nearly a year of being stonewalled by CBP, the Guild launched its own complaint against DOS and CBP.  That case wound on, and on, and on in District Court with a final judgement that the complaint was not justiciable.  That is, it could not be tried in a court of law.  That ruling was appealed and the Appellate Court chose not to address the fundamental issues—but said they could be addressed in a Forfeiture Action.  The complaint was then submitted to the US Supreme Court in a Writ of Certiorari, which the Court unfortunately did not entertain.  The Forfeiture Action was scheduled with the same judge in Baltimore that presided over the original ACCG complaint and the result was similar to that of the original case in terms of addressing the merits of the bureaucratic rule-making.  That judgement is now pending appeal.

In Mr. Hilaire's blog post, he describes these legal actions as "...the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild's (ACCG) invitation to strike down or weaken import restrictions that protect endangered ancient coins."  That is misleading on two points.  First, the ACCG is, and always has been, supportive of CCPIA and has no desire to strike down the law nor its provisions as enacted.  That may very well include import restrictions on coins that are truly "endangered" (but most are not).  Secondly, the coins that ACCG imported to challenge the extralegal bureaucratic rule-making are anything but "endangered ancient coins."  They are, in fact, poor examples of common coins that have very little commercial value and no particular historical nor art historical significance and no connection whatever to an archaeological contextAs Urice and Adler mentioned in this very case, the coins were legally exported.  These coins were chosen purposely to illustrate how inflexible the rule-making has become.  The fact that the U.S. government has already invested eight years and an extraordinary sum financially in defense and prosecution expenses, as well as the court's valuable time, just to seize coins worth less than $200 is perhaps an indication that they are more interested in deflecting attention from their so-called "extralegal" action than in saving "endangered coins".   In his second paragraph, Hilaire cites "...ACCG's eight-year long legal struggle to attack American import restrictions placed on ancient coins in danger of cultural heritage looting and trafficking."  He simply, and perhaps innocently, misunderstands ACCG's motivation and the point of this entire effort.

The decision of Judge Blake in Baltimore is accurately cited by Hilaire, but ACCG is obviously not content to accept a judgement that we see as contrary to our fundamental rights as well as the letter and intent of existing federal law.  The government's position and the court's interpretation of CCPIA do not coincide with a reasonable interpretation of that law, nor the existing Congressional record of those who labored in committee to produce this piece of legislation.  We know what they felt about burden of proof in 1983, and specifically about its applicability regarding the importation of ancient coins, because they have told us under oath in documented Congressional hearings.  We also know  because some of the "players" in that event are still alive today.  

For the bureaucracy to arbitrarily reinterpret the meaning of CCPIA is a disservice to the whole concept of representative government.  In the present situation, innocent collectors of ancient coins are unfairly suffering.  In the case of a federal bureaucracy's ultra vires rule-making being validated and confirmed by federal courts, the whole nation suffers from an untenable precedent.  Urice and Adler see the solution to this in statutory reform.  ACCG has also recognized a need for statutory review by Congress of some provisions of CCPIA, but in the meantime feels a moral obligation to fight for justice and rule of law with every resource at its disposal—and will continue to do so.


Sunday, February 26, 2017

WGS Interview

I recently came across an interview that I did a few years ago for CoinSupplyPlanet.com and thought it may be worth sharing here since it is still as relevant as the day it was recorded.


The full interview can be viewed and read at the link above

Monday, October 17, 2016

Archaeologists Question Media Sensationalism

Ancient coin collectors in the United States had good reason to smile this past weekend.  Archaeologist Paul Barford in his blog Portable Antiquity Collecting and Heritage Issues joined a growing list of critics who believe that U.S. government officials are being swayed by false information.  Specifically, Mr. Barford cites major media reports regarding ISIS funding as tainting a recent Congressional Homeland Security Committee Report with "outdated information, misrepresented statistics, and discredited figures."  He goes on to suggest that congressional staffers who authored the report "...searched for reports published in major media outlets without critically examining them.  "Much of the media coverage of archaeological looting in Iraq and Syria has been driven by sensationalism."

Ironically, the day following Mr. Barford's blog post, a segment of the U.S. television show "Madam Secretary" included some of the very same sensationalism.   In this episode, a "fictional" political upheaval in Algeria, and supposed destruction of monuments, is portrayed as a cover for the theft and sale of antiquities to raise funds for Jihadists.  The TV episode was obviously inspired by the same major media reports that swayed Congress. 

The popularity of this sensational journalism and media entertainment is easy to understand.  One can even see how it becomes believable to those with limited background in the issues.  However, the process is not without victims.  Certainly, the loss of history and culture is devastating to all of civilization—but the victimization of honest and thoughtful individuals who legally own and enjoy objects from the past is not a rational nor ethical weapon in the fight against that loss that we all suffer from.  I think Mr. Barford and I might agree on that point.

For ancient coin collectors who are reading these words, there can be little doubt that we need to be proactive in helping to reduce or eliminate the looting and illegal export of coins from source countries.  Although provenance has never been a concern in past centuries, it is one of the few ways that legitimacy can become an element of due diligence.  As collectors, we need to create and maintain better records of provenance—at least for objects of significant value.  That will, over time, help protect the "orphans" from old collections.  At the same time, both the public and the guardians of public interest need to follow the path of truth and the laws that govern our union.  The sensationalism that drives our moment is not helping.   

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Steven Andrew Sayles 1964-2016

 

   Steven Andrew Sayles was born in Gander, Newfoundland on March 14, 1964 to Wayne G. and Sharon L. (Greshay) Sayles.  As a child, Steve had an inquisitive nature and was far more worldly than his years might have suggested.  He was an avid collector of postage stamps from distant lands and was an amateur radio operator who logged conversations with fellow "Hams" in many foreign countries.  He grew up with a global perspective, partly as the result of having been raised in a military family with its frequent relocations.  After leaving Gander, the family lived in North Carolina and Florida before moving to Turkey for two years.  There, many enjoyable weekends were spent exploring ancient Greek and Roman sites and absorbing the local culture.  Subsequent homes in Wisconsin, California, Texas and Mississippi helped Steve's world view continue to grow.  In 1973, the family moved to Athens, Greece and enjoyed an adventurous two years in that storied land, including an overland excursion through Yugoslavia, Austria and Germany to Paris, France in a Volkswagon Camper Bus.  Having developed a fascination with ancient Egypt at the age of 10, Steve and his mother visited the Pyramids as part of a Mediterranean cruise.  Weekend sailing in the Saronic Gulf and visits to the beaches of Greece were frequent outings for the family during that time.

   Steve's High School years were split between Amery, Wisconsin and Scott Air Force Base, Illinois.  It was at Mascoutah High School in 1981 that Steve became interested in computer programming.  He had a natural affinity for computers and later studied computer science at the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. By the end of the 1980s, Steve was working closely with his father in producing a monthly hobby publication, The Celator, for collectors of ancient coins.  He took to ancient coins like a duck to water.  His writing, editing and computer skills served the publication well and he was elevated to the position of Publisher/Editor in September of 1995.  Steve also contributed to several major book projects in the ancient coin collecting field as a production manager and proof reader. During his years at The Celator, he was a familiar face at coin conventions across the country where he stayed abreast of market and hobby news and activities.  More recently, Steve was self-employed in the construction trade. 

   Steven Sayles passed away unexpectedly of a heart attack on Friday, July 15, 2016.  He was 52 years old.  He is survived by his mother, Sharon Greshay of Juneau, Wisconsin; father and stepmother Wayne and Doris Sayles of Gainesville, Missouri; brother Scott Sayles of Gainesville, Missouri; sister Stephanie Sayles of Middleton, Wisconsin and grandmother Betty J. Sayles of Coupeville, Washington.
    

Wednesday, March 02, 2016

An Intellectual Curiosity

"We treat all stakeholders with a vested interest in the site with the same intellectual curiosity, which means we interact with and learn from local populations, dealers, collectors, looters, government employees, archaeologists, museum professionals, tourists, and customs agents."

 Morag Kersal,
Archaeologist and Assistant Professor at DePaul University

http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/02/2016/monitoring-looting-in-jordan-using-drones

Treating ancient coin collectors with intellectual curiosity is an interesting way for Professor Morag Kersal to describe interaction with a learning discipline that is older than any university in the world.  Some of the foremost names in international leadership, social justice, art, science, literature, philanthropy, commerce and virtually every other facet of life were collectors of ancient coins.  Of course they are viewed with a certain level of curiosity because they typically find their tactile learning experience a passion, as well as exceptionally educational and rewarding endeavor.  Today, that remarkable experience continues to attract people of very diverse stations in life and does indeed make them vested stakeholders in preserving the past.   Collectors, through tourism and social media, often interact with local populations in regions where ancient cultures left their mark.  They obviously have a close connection to dealers who trade internationally in licit coins from virtually every corner of the earth.  As a group, collectors are closely knit and delight in sharing discoveries.  While few of them ever interact directly with looters, they clearly suffer the consequences of looting as much as anyone else who has a love of the past.  A collector interacts with government employees, including customs agents, virtually every time an order is placed in the international market.  In spite of ideologically driven recrimination, they frequently and proudly share their knowledge and experience with archaeologists, museum workers and other academic professionals.  It should be no wonder that intellectual curiosity comes into play when interacting with ancient coin collectors—they are certainly worthy of the distinction.   

Sunday, January 31, 2016

RESTART

Frequent readers here will know that I have tried on at least two prior occasions to restart the focus of this blog and avoid cultural property issues which only lead to frustration and ill will.  Unfortunately, those issues can tend to take over one's thought process and overpower the intent of a blog itself.  Consequently, it is time to restart again.  We will henceforth talk only about ancient coin collecting and avoid all reference to the political and ideological aspects at hand.  Hopefully this time the focus will stay on the joys and benefits of a great hobby and avocation.